SUZU Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · PG

Papua New Guinea country risk and resilience

Papua New Guinea country risk and resilience: #101 of 169 in SUZU Monitor's resilience index, with live instability, advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Papua New Guinea instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputReconsider Travel
OFAC designations in feedNone in feed
Live enhancement pending
Open Papua New Guinea on the live map →

Recent developments in Papua New Guinea

Country brief

Key risks

The most severe government travel advisory World Monitor tracks for Papua New Guinea is Reconsider Travel, as of Nov 2, 2026, indicating elevated risk for travelers. [E1]

Watch items

Whether the drought crisis will deepen before the next rainy season. [1]

SUZU Monitor data cited

  • E1 · Travel advisory: Reconsider Travel ·

Automated summary of 1 cited report and 1 SUZU Monitor data point, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#101
Overall score50.5
Dimension coverage80%
ConfidenceStandard

Papua New Guinea resilience analysis

Papua New Guinea ranks #101 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 50.5 out of 100. Structural readiness is the weakest pillar at 59.9, with recovery capacity next at 64.6. Live shock exposure is strongest at 65.8, while Health, food and water is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 46.3. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -1.1 points. Dimension coverage is 80%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water8100%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance16100%Fresh
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity35100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance37100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity37100%Stale
Core infrastructureInfrastructure3870%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity5885%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance5892%Stale
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity6480%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity67100%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity68100%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity70100%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance73100%Stale
Energy system resilienceEnergy security7570%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance7755%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity85100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water9382%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity98100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure10050%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Colombia (#100, 50.6), Cambodia (#102, 50.4), Argentina (#99, 50.7), India (#103, 50.4). Comparisons in East Asia and the Pacific: Cambodia (#102, 50.4), Indonesia (#94, 51.9), Thailand (#92, 52.1), Vietnam (#90, 52.4), Laos (#88, 53). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Papua New Guinea has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 18 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Infrastructure, 80.3. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Papua New Guinea

What is Papua New Guinea's resilience score?

Papua New Guinea scores 50.5 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #101 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Papua New Guinea?

Structural readiness is lowest at 59.9, followed by Recovery capacity at 64.6. Their evidence coverage is 90% and 63%.

Is Papua New Guinea's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -1.1 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related country profiles

Linked to Papua New Guinea by a shared crisis tracker, a monitored tension pair, proximity or region.

Need Papua New Guinea signals in your own workflow? Compare SUZU Monitor Pro and API plans for Papua New Guinea risk data. Pro adds alert rules and AI digests; API plans serve country resilience and instability data over REST.

Live data

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the November 1, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Papua New Guinea are in the corrections log.

This 2026-11-01 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where SUZU Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: SUZU Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, November 1, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How SUZU Monitor compares: Best geopolitical risk intelligence platforms · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.