SUZU Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · RS

Serbia country risk and resilience

Serbia country risk and resilience: ranked #31 of 169 in SUZU Monitor's Country Resilience Index, with live instability, travel-advisory and sanctions signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Serbia instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Increased Caution
OFAC designations in feed51 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Serbia on the live map →

Recent developments in Serbia

Country brief

Outlook

A Polymarket market related to Serbia, "Will Vladan Đokić win the next Serbia presidential election?", priced Yes at 7% on Nov 2, 2026; it closes May 2, 2027. [E4]

Watch items

Whether the EU will act on its new threat to Serbia. [3]

The outcome of the Polymarket market on whether Vladan Đokić will win the next Serbia presidential election, closing May 2, 2027. [E4]

SUZU Monitor data cited

Automated summary of 1 cited report and 1 SUZU Monitor data point, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#31
Overall score61.8
Dimension coverage81%
ConfidenceStandard

Serbia resilience analysis

Serbia ranks #31 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 61.8 out of 100. Structural readiness is the weakest pillar at 71.1, with live shock exposure next at 71.5. Recovery capacity is strongest at 74.8, while Energy security is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 64. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at +0.1 points. Dimension coverage is 81%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure2750%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance46100%Fresh
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity47100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity58100%Stale
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water59100%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance61100%Stale
Energy system resilienceEnergy security6490%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity67100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance7355%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity7664%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance77100%Stale
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity77100%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity7985%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance79100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7970%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity7995%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity89100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water9082%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity99100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Qatar (#30, 62), United Kingdom (#32, 61.5), Montenegro (#29, 62.2), Greece (#33, 61.5). Comparisons in Europe: Greece (#33, 61.5), United Kingdom (#32, 61.5), Montenegro (#29, 62.2), Estonia (#34, 61.3), Slovakia (#35, 61.2). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Serbia has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 18 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Economic capacity, 78.3. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Serbia

What is Serbia's resilience score?

Serbia scores 61.8 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #31 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Serbia?

Structural readiness is lowest at 71.1, followed by Live shock exposure at 71.5. Their evidence coverage is 89% and 85%.

Is Serbia's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of +0.1 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related country profiles

Linked to Serbia by a shared crisis tracker, a monitored tension pair, proximity or region.

Need Serbia signals in your own workflow? Compare SUZU Monitor Pro and API plans for Serbia risk data. Pro adds alert rules and AI digests; API plans serve country resilience and instability data over REST.

Live data

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the November 1, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Serbia are in the corrections log.

This 2026-11-01 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where SUZU Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: SUZU Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, November 1, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How SUZU Monitor compares: Best geopolitical risk intelligence platforms · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.