SUZU Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · AF

Afghanistan Country Instability Index

Afghanistan's Country Instability Index is 60/100 · Elevated, unchanged over a 24-hour comparison window, as of .

CII measures current stress. SUZU Monitor's separate Country Resilience Index measures Afghanistan's longer-term structural capacity.

Official name: Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. Wikidata identity record.

Current signal

Afghanistan instability monitor

Published pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score60Elevated
24-hour comparison-window movementUnchanged
Travel advisory inputDo Not Travel
OFAC designations in feed80 designated entities
Open Afghanistan on the live map →

Recent developments in Afghanistan

Afghanistan's Country Instability Index is 60/100 · Elevated, unchanged over a 24-hour comparison window, as of . Reporting captured in the same window is listed below.

Country brief

Key risks

The most severe government travel advisory for Afghanistan is Do Not Travel, indicating extreme risk for any individual in the country. [E2]

SUZU Monitor data cited

  • E2 · Travel advisory: Do Not Travel ·

Automated summary of 1 SUZU Monitor data point, generated .

  1. GDELT 193 — in Afghanistan — source: dunyanews.tv conflict source
  2. GDELT 190 — in Afghanistan — source: www.geo.tv conflict source
  3. GDELT 190 — in Afghanistan — source: www.afghanislamicpress.com conflict source
  4. GDELT 190 — in Afghanistan — source: www.afghanislamicpress.com conflict source
  5. GDELT 193 — in Afghanistan — source: pajhwok.com conflict source
  6. GDELT 182 — in Afghanistan — source: pajhwok.com conflict source
  7. GDELT 190 — in Afghanistan — source: www.theepochtimes.com conflict source
  8. GDELT 190 — in Afghanistan — source: pakobserver.net conflict source
  9. GDELT 1831 — in Afghanistan — source: antonyloewenstein.com conflict source
  10. GDELT 1831 — in Afghanistan — source: antonyloewenstein.com conflict source

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#162
Overall score34.2
Dimension coverage73%
ConfidenceStandard

Afghanistan resilience analysis

Afghanistan ranks #162 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 34.2 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 37.8, with structural readiness next at 49.7. Live shock exposure is strongest at 57.8, while Health, food and water is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 16. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at +0.4 points. Dimension coverage is 73%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Education capacitySocial and governance6100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity7100%Stale
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water10100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance13100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water22100%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance2892%Stale
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity4480%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity58100%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity5985%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity64100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance64100%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance69100%Stale
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7070%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure75100%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security9870%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure10050%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity100100%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Import concentrationRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Chad (#161, 34.6), Iran (#163, 33.7), Ethiopia (#160, 36.3), Niger (#164, 32.9). Comparisons in South Asia: Bangladesh (#147, 40.6), Pakistan (#146, 41.1), Sri Lanka (#109, 49.4), India (#103, 50.4), Nepal (#97, 51.1). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

The crisis registry links Afghanistan to Afghanistan crisis. Tracker scopes are fixed and do not cover every crisis.

Reading limits

Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 98. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Afghanistan

What is Afghanistan's Country Instability Index?

Afghanistan's Country Instability Index is 60/100 (Elevated), unchanged over a 24-hour comparison window, as of Nov 2, 2026, 4:44 AM UTC.

What is Afghanistan's resilience score?

Afghanistan scores 34.2 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #162 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Afghanistan?

Recovery capacity is lowest at 37.8, followed by Structural readiness at 49.7. Their evidence coverage is 36% and 95%.

Is Afghanistan's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of +0.4 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related country profiles

Linked to Afghanistan by a shared crisis tracker, a monitored tension pair, proximity or region.

Need Afghanistan signals in your own workflow? Compare SUZU Monitor Pro and API plans for Afghanistan risk data. Pro adds alert rules and AI digests; API plans serve country resilience and instability data over REST.

Live data

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the November 1, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Afghanistan are in the corrections log.

This 2026-11-01 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where SUZU Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: SUZU Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, November 1, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How SUZU Monitor compares: Best geopolitical risk intelligence platforms · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.