SUZU Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · TD

Chad country risk and resilience

Chad country risk and resilience: ranked #161 of 169 in SUZU Monitor's Country Resilience Index, with live instability, travel-advisory and sanctions signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Official name: Republic of Chad. Wikidata identity record.

Current signal

Chad instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputDo Not Travel
OFAC designations in feedNone in feed
Live enhancement pending
Open Chad on the live map →

Recent developments in Chad

Country brief

What this means for Chad

The planned air force training between France and Chad may improve security, but the Do Not Travel advisory for Chad as of Nov 2, 2026 indicates persistent danger for foreign visitors. [1][E1]

Key risks

The Do Not Travel advisory for Chad as of Nov 2, 2026 signals a high risk of harm to travelers. [E1]

Watch items

Whether ethnic clashes over water will escalate further in Chad. [2]

SUZU Monitor data cited

  • E1 · Travel advisory: Do Not Travel ·

Automated summary of 2 cited reports and 1 SUZU Monitor data point, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#161
Overall score34.6
Dimension coverage77%
ConfidenceStandard

Chad resilience analysis

Chad ranks #161 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 34.6 out of 100. Live shock exposure is the weakest pillar at 42.6, with structural readiness next at 43.1. Recovery capacity is strongest at 65.5, while Health, food and water is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 29.5. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.7 points. Dimension coverage is 77%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Education capacitySocial and governance280%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water12100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure16100%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity21100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance22100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure25100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity34100%Stale
Social cohesionSocial and governance4092%Stale
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity4385%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water47100%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security5390%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity5580%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity5676%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance6555%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance67100%Stale
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity67100%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity99100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Import concentrationRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Ethiopia (#160, 36.3), Afghanistan (#162, 34.2), Burkina Faso (#159, 36.9), Iran (#163, 33.7). Comparisons in sub-Saharan Africa: Ethiopia (#160, 36.3), Niger (#164, 32.9), Burkina Faso (#159, 36.9), Central African Republic (#158, 37.2), Mali (#165, 31.5). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Chad has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 18 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Recovery capacity, 65.5. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Chad

What is Chad's resilience score?

Chad scores 34.6 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #161 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Chad?

Live shock exposure is lowest at 42.6, followed by Structural readiness at 43.1. Their evidence coverage is 97% and 85%.

Is Chad's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.7 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related country profiles

Linked to Chad by a shared crisis tracker, a monitored tension pair, proximity or region.

Need Chad signals in your own workflow? Compare SUZU Monitor Pro and API plans for Chad risk data. Pro adds alert rules and AI digests; API plans serve country resilience and instability data over REST.

Live data

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the November 1, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Chad are in the corrections log.

This 2026-11-01 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where SUZU Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: SUZU Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, November 1, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How SUZU Monitor compares: Best geopolitical risk intelligence platforms · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.