SUZU Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · CD

DR Congo country risk and resilience

DR Congo country risk and resilience: ranked #156 of 169 in SUZU Monitor's resilience index, with live instability, advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Official name: Democratic Republic of the Congo. Wikidata identity record.

Current signal

DR Congo instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputDo Not Travel
OFAC designations in feed85 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open DR Congo on the live map →

Recent developments in DR Congo

Country brief

Key risks

Congo - Kinshasa is linked to 85 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations, as of Nov 2, 2026. [E2]

Watch items

Whether the discharge of the last Ebola patients signals the end of the outbreak or a temporary lull. [5]

SUZU Monitor data cited

  • E2 · US OFAC and Canada SEMA designations: 85 ·

Automated summary of 1 cited report and 1 SUZU Monitor data point, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#156
Overall score38.5
Dimension coverage86%
ConfidenceStandard

DR Congo resilience analysis

DR Congo ranks #156 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 38.5 out of 100. Structural readiness is the weakest pillar at 46.4, with recovery capacity next at 52.9. Live shock exposure is strongest at 59.5, while Social and governance is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 39.4. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at +0.3 points. Dimension coverage is 86%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity6100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity9100%Stale
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water14100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure14100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance19100%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance21100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure25100%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance2692%Stale
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity3180%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity4176%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity55100%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity5885%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance62100%Stale
Information environmentSocial and governance6285%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity76100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water9382%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security9490%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure95100%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity95100%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity100100%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Benin (#155, 38.9), Cameroon (#157, 38.5), Zimbabwe (#154, 39.4), Central African Republic (#158, 37.2). Comparisons in sub-Saharan Africa: Cameroon (#157, 38.5), Benin (#155, 38.9), Eritrea, Zimbabwe (#154, 39.4), Guinea-Bissau (#153, 39.6). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

The crisis registry links DR Congo to DR Congo conflict. Tracker scopes are fixed and do not cover every crisis.

Reading limits

Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 94. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about DR Congo

What is DR Congo's resilience score?

DR Congo scores 38.5 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #156 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for DR Congo?

Structural readiness is lowest at 46.4, followed by Recovery capacity at 52.9. Their evidence coverage is 90% and 63%.

Is DR Congo's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of +0.3 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related country profiles

Linked to DR Congo by a shared crisis tracker, a monitored tension pair, proximity or region.

Need DR Congo signals in your own workflow? Compare SUZU Monitor Pro and API plans for DR Congo risk data. Pro adds alert rules and AI digests; API plans serve country resilience and instability data over REST.

Live data

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the November 1, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect DR Congo are in the corrections log.

This 2026-11-01 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where SUZU Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: SUZU Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, November 1, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How SUZU Monitor compares: Best geopolitical risk intelligence platforms · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.