SUZU Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · JO

Jordan country risk and resilience

Jordan country risk and resilience: ranked #87 of 169 in SUZU Monitor's Country Resilience Index, with live instability, travel-advisory and sanctions signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Jordan instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputReconsider Travel
OFAC designations in feed20 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Jordan on the live map →

Recent developments in Jordan

Country brief

What this means for Jordan

Jordan's decision to stop fighters from Syria reflects heightened border tensions, and the most severe government travel advisory World Monitor tracks for Jordan is Reconsider Travel as of Nov 2, 2026. [2][E1]

Key risks

Jordan is linked to 20 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations, as of Nov 2, 2026. [E2]

Watch items

Whether Jordan will maintain its border measures amid heightened tensions with Syria. [2]

SUZU Monitor data cited

  • E1 · Travel advisory: Reconsider Travel ·
  • E2 · US OFAC and Canada SEMA designations: 20 ·

Automated summary of 1 cited report and 2 SUZU Monitor data points, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#87
Overall score53
Dimension coverage82%
ConfidenceStandard

Jordan resilience analysis

Jordan ranks #87 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 53 out of 100. Structural readiness is the weakest pillar at 59.5, with recovery capacity next at 64.9. Live shock exposure is strongest at 75.6, while Economic capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 58.5. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.2 points. Dimension coverage is 82%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity44100%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance45100%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity46100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance50100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water5382%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity5495%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity6085%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance6255%Fresh
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity62100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity63100%Stale
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity66100%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance66100%Stale
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water68100%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance72100%Stale
Energy system resilienceEnergy security7390%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7970%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity79100%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity86100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure10050%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Trinidad and Tobago (#86, 53.1), Laos (#88, 53), Panama (#85, 53.3), Dominican Republic (#89, 52.9). Comparisons in the Middle East and North Africa: Algeria (#95, 51.4), Morocco (#105, 50.3), Saudi Arabia (#60, 56.7), Oman (#59, 57.1), Malta (#58, 57.3). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Jordan has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 18 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Infrastructure, 93.3. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Jordan

What is Jordan's resilience score?

Jordan scores 53 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #87 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Jordan?

Structural readiness is lowest at 59.5, followed by Recovery capacity at 64.9. Their evidence coverage is 93% and 63%.

Is Jordan's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.2 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related country profiles

Linked to Jordan by a shared crisis tracker, a monitored tension pair, proximity or region.

Need Jordan signals in your own workflow? Compare SUZU Monitor Pro and API plans for Jordan risk data. Pro adds alert rules and AI digests; API plans serve country resilience and instability data over REST.

Live data

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the November 1, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Jordan are in the corrections log.

This 2026-11-01 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where SUZU Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: SUZU Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, November 1, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How SUZU Monitor compares: Best geopolitical risk intelligence platforms · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.