SUZU Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · MY

Malaysia country risk and resilience

Malaysia country risk and resilience: ranked #62 of 169 in SUZU Monitor's resilience index, with instability, travel advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Malaysia instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Normal Precautions
OFAC designations in feed44 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Malaysia on the live map →

Recent developments in Malaysia

Country brief

Watch items

Whether Malaysia's Gig Workers Act will be effectively delivered as debated by Lee Hwok-Aun. [1]

Whether Japan's Sojitz will proceed with importing rare earth yttrium from Malaysia. [2]

Automated summary of 2 cited reports, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#62
Overall score56.7
Dimension coverage77%
ConfidenceStandard

Malaysia resilience analysis

Malaysia ranks #62 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 56.7 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 64, with structural readiness next at 66.7. Live shock exposure is strongest at 75.5, while Recovery capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 64. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.7 points. Dimension coverage is 77%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure2750%Fresh
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity30100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance5755%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance59100%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity6085%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity60100%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity62100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity68100%Stale
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water70100%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance7292%Stale
Border securitySocial and governance73100%Stale
Education capacitySocial and governance75100%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security7690%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity7665%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity78100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7970%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity83100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure86100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water9282%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Vanuatu (#61, 56.7), Fiji (#63, 56.4), Saudi Arabia (#60, 56.7), Belize (#64, 56.1). Comparisons in East Asia and the Pacific: Vanuatu (#61, 56.7), Fiji (#63, 56.4), Singapore (#56, 57.4), Solomon Islands (#54, 57.8), Mongolia (#70, 55.4). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Malaysia has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 18 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Health, food and water, 79.9. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Malaysia

What is Malaysia's resilience score?

Malaysia scores 56.7 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #62 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Malaysia?

Recovery capacity is lowest at 64, followed by Structural readiness at 66.7. Their evidence coverage is 54% and 88%.

Is Malaysia's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.7 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related country profiles

Linked to Malaysia by a shared crisis tracker, a monitored tension pair, proximity or region.

Need Malaysia signals in your own workflow? Compare SUZU Monitor Pro and API plans for Malaysia risk data. Pro adds alert rules and AI digests; API plans serve country resilience and instability data over REST.

Related chokepoint trackers

Live data

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the November 1, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Malaysia are in the corrections log.

This 2026-11-01 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where SUZU Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: SUZU Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, November 1, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How SUZU Monitor compares: Best geopolitical risk intelligence platforms · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.