SUZU Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · PH

Philippines country risk and resilience

Philippines country risk and resilience: ranked #81 of 169 in SUZU Monitor's index, with current instability, travel advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Official name: Republic of the Philippines. Wikidata identity record.

Current signal

Philippines instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Increased Caution
OFAC designations in feed18 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Philippines on the live map →

Recent developments in Philippines

Country brief

Watch items

Whether the PRC's escalated political warfare will lead to further conflict or de-escalation. [3]

Automated summary of 1 cited report, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#81
Overall score53.8
Dimension coverage82%
ConfidenceStandard

Philippines resilience analysis

Philippines ranks #81 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 53.8 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 64.1, with structural readiness next at 64.4. Live shock exposure is strongest at 67.9, while Social and governance is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 57.5. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.8 points. Dimension coverage is 82%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure2750%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity28100%Stale
Education capacitySocial and governance39100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance43100%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water45100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance5755%Fresh
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity57100%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance5792%Stale
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity59100%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity5995%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity72100%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security7490%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7570%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity8085%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity81100%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance82100%Stale
Food and water securityHealth, food and water8282%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity82100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure86100%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity91100%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Maldives (#80, 54.1), El Salvador (#82, 53.6), Armenia (#79, 54.5), Cape Verde (#83, 53.4). Comparisons in East Asia and the Pacific: Kiribati, Laos (#88, 53), Hong Kong (#78, 54.7), Timor-Leste (#76, 54.8), China (#73, 55). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Philippines has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 18 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 74. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Philippines

What is Philippines's resilience score?

Philippines scores 53.8 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #81 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Philippines?

Recovery capacity is lowest at 64.1, followed by Structural readiness at 64.4. Their evidence coverage is 63% and 92%.

Is Philippines's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.8 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related country profiles

Linked to Philippines by a shared crisis tracker, a monitored tension pair, proximity or region.

Need Philippines signals in your own workflow? Compare SUZU Monitor Pro and API plans for Philippines risk data. Pro adds alert rules and AI digests; API plans serve country resilience and instability data over REST.

Live data

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the November 1, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Philippines are in the corrections log.

This 2026-11-01 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where SUZU Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: SUZU Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, November 1, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How SUZU Monitor compares: Best geopolitical risk intelligence platforms · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.