SUZU Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · MN

Mongolia country risk and resilience

Mongolia country risk and resilience: ranked #70 of 169 in SUZU Monitor's resilience index, with instability, travel advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Mongolia instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Normal Precautions
OFAC designations in feed8 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Mongolia on the live map →

Recent developments in Mongolia

Country brief

Key risks

Mongolia is linked to 8 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations, as of Nov 2, 2026. [E2]

Watch items

Whether responsibility for the fire that devastated a Mongolian nature reserve will be assigned. [1]

SUZU Monitor data cited

  • E2 · US OFAC and Canada SEMA designations: 8 ·

Automated summary of 1 cited report and 1 SUZU Monitor data point, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#70
Overall score55.4
Dimension coverage80%
ConfidenceStandard

Mongolia resilience analysis

Mongolia ranks #70 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 55.4 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 62.4, with structural readiness next at 66.3. Live shock exposure is strongest at 74.5, while Economic capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 59.4. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -1.9 points. Dimension coverage is 80%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure2750%Fresh
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity29100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance48100%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity5085%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity54100%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity55100%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity6395%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity63100%Stale
Energy system resilienceEnergy security6690%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity6765%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance6992%Stale
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water70100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance7055%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity74100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7870%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity83100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water9282%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance93100%Stale
Education capacitySocial and governance93100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Paraguay (#69, 55.4), Belarus (#71, 55.3), Nicaragua (#68, 55.4), Moldova (#72, 55.2). Comparisons in East Asia and the Pacific: China (#73, 55), Timor-Leste (#76, 54.8), Hong Kong (#78, 54.7), Fiji (#63, 56.4), Malaysia (#62, 56.7). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Mongolia has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 18 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Health, food and water, 79.9. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Mongolia

What is Mongolia's resilience score?

Mongolia scores 55.4 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #70 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Mongolia?

Recovery capacity is lowest at 62.4, followed by Structural readiness at 66.3. Their evidence coverage is 58% and 92%.

Is Mongolia's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -1.9 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related country profiles

Linked to Mongolia by a shared crisis tracker, a monitored tension pair, proximity or region.

Need Mongolia signals in your own workflow? Compare SUZU Monitor Pro and API plans for Mongolia risk data. Pro adds alert rules and AI digests; API plans serve country resilience and instability data over REST.

Live data

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the November 1, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Mongolia are in the corrections log.

This 2026-11-01 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where SUZU Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: SUZU Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, November 1, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How SUZU Monitor compares: Best geopolitical risk intelligence platforms · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.