SUZU Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · ZA

South Africa country risk and resilience

South Africa country risk and resilience: ranked #117 of 169 in SUZU Monitor's index, with live instability, travel advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Official name: Republic of South Africa. Wikidata identity record.

Current signal

South Africa instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Increased Caution
OFAC designations in feed48 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open South Africa on the live map →

Recent developments in South Africa

Country brief

Watch items

Whether the investigation into the unidentified exporter's appeal to send Baobab trees to Georgia will lead to further sanctions or legal actions. [2]

Automated summary of 1 cited report, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#117
Overall score47.5
Dimension coverage86%
ConfidenceStandard

South Africa resilience analysis

South Africa ranks #117 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 47.5 out of 100. Live shock exposure is the weakest pillar at 57.7, with recovery capacity next at 59.7. Structural readiness is strongest at 62.7, while Infrastructure is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 50. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.6 points. Dimension coverage is 86%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure14100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity34100%Stale
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water47100%Fresh
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity47100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance48100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure50100%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance52100%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity56100%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity57100%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity57100%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance5792%Stale
Food and water securityHealth, food and water6682%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance69100%Stale
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity69100%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security7290%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance7555%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity76100%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity7785%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity85100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure86100%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Ukraine (#116, 47.9), Zambia (#118, 47.3), Ecuador (#115, 48.2), Bolivia (#119, 47.2). Comparisons in sub-Saharan Africa: Zambia (#118, 47.3), Gabon (#120, 46.8), Namibia (#114, 48.3), Botswana (#121, 46.6), Comoros (#111, 48.6). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

South Africa has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 18 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 72. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about South Africa

What is South Africa's resilience score?

South Africa scores 47.5 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #117 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for South Africa?

Live shock exposure is lowest at 57.7, followed by Recovery capacity at 59.7. Their evidence coverage is 94% and 63%.

Is South Africa's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.6 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related country profiles

Linked to South Africa by a shared crisis tracker, a monitored tension pair, proximity or region.

Need South Africa signals in your own workflow? Compare SUZU Monitor Pro and API plans for South Africa risk data. Pro adds alert rules and AI digests; API plans serve country resilience and instability data over REST.

Related chokepoint trackers

Live data

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the November 1, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect South Africa are in the corrections log.

This 2026-11-01 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where SUZU Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: SUZU Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, November 1, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How SUZU Monitor compares: Best geopolitical risk intelligence platforms · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.