SUZU Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · DJ

Djibouti country risk and resilience

Djibouti country risk and resilience: ranked #135 of 169 in SUZU Monitor's resilience index, with live instability, advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Djibouti instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Increased Caution
OFAC designations in feed4 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Djibouti on the live map →

Recent developments in Djibouti

  1. GDELT 190 — in Djibouti — source: www.middleeasteye.net conflict source
  2. GDELT 190 — in Djibouti — source: www.geo.tv conflict source
  3. GDELT 190 — in Djibouti — source: www.militarytimes.com conflict source
  4. GDELT 190 — in Djibouti — source: www.riotimesonline.com conflict source
  5. GDELT 190 — in Djibouti — source: www.riotimesonline.com conflict source
  6. GDELT 190 — in Djibouti — source: english.news.cn conflict source
  7. GDELT 190 — in Djibouti — source: english.news.cn conflict source
  8. GDELT 190 — in Djibouti — source: english.news.cn conflict source
  9. GDELT 190 — in Djibouti — source: www.riotimesonline.com conflict source
  10. GDELT 190 — in Djibouti — source: newstodaynet.com conflict source

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#135
Overall score42.9
Dimension coverage84%
ConfidenceStandard

Djibouti resilience analysis

Djibouti ranks #135 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 42.9 out of 100. Live shock exposure is the weakest pillar at 53.5, with structural readiness next at 56.4. Recovery capacity is strongest at 58.2, while Health, food and water is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 41. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.6 points. Dimension coverage is 84%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity0100%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance1180%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure14100%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water29100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance33100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance3355%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity40100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure40100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water53100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity56100%Stale
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity6085%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity61100%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance6192%Stale
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity6280%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity63100%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance77100%Stale
Energy system resilienceEnergy security7970%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity82100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity100100%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Lebanon (#134, 43), Côte d’Ivoire (#136, 42.7), Angola (#133, 43.1), Madagascar (#137, 42.7). Comparisons in the Middle East and North Africa: Lebanon (#134, 43), Tunisia (#140, 42.3), Libya (#129, 43.7), Turkey (#127, 45.2), Bahrain (#124, 46.2). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

The crisis registry links Djibouti to Red Sea security. Tracker scopes are fixed and do not cover every crisis.

Reading limits

Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 79. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Djibouti

What is Djibouti's resilience score?

Djibouti scores 42.9 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #135 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Djibouti?

Live shock exposure is lowest at 53.5, followed by Structural readiness at 56.4. Their evidence coverage is 90% and 88%.

Is Djibouti's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.6 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related country profiles

Linked to Djibouti by a shared crisis tracker, a monitored tension pair, proximity or region.

Need Djibouti signals in your own workflow? Compare SUZU Monitor Pro and API plans for Djibouti risk data. Pro adds alert rules and AI digests; API plans serve country resilience and instability data over REST.

Related chokepoint trackers

Live data

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the November 1, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Djibouti are in the corrections log.

This 2026-11-01 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where SUZU Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: SUZU Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, November 1, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How SUZU Monitor compares: Best geopolitical risk intelligence platforms · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.