SUZU Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · SS

South Sudan country risk and resilience

South Sudan country risk and resilience: ranked #167 of 169 in SUZU Monitor's index, with live instability, travel advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Official name: Republic of South Sudan. Wikidata identity record.

Current signal

South Sudan instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputDo Not Travel
OFAC designations in feed33 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open South Sudan on the live map →

Recent developments in South Sudan

  1. GDELT 180 — in South Sudan — source: www.azernews.az conflict source
  2. GDELT 181 — in South Sudan — source: www.radiotamazuj.org conflict source
  3. GDELT 181 — in South Sudan — source: www.radiotamazuj.org conflict source
  4. GDELT 181 — in South Sudan — source: www.radiotamazuj.org conflict source
  5. GDELT 192 — in South Sudan — source: www.radiotamazuj.org conflict source
  6. GDELT 190 — in South Sudan — source: ntv.co.ug conflict source
  7. GDELT 190 — in South Sudan — source: www.oikoumene.org conflict source
  8. GDELT 190 — in South Sudan — source: english.news.cn conflict source
  9. GDELT 190 — in South Sudan — source: english.news.cn conflict source
  10. GDELT 190 — in South Sudan — source: allafrica.com conflict source

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#167
Overall score28.4
Dimension coverage72%
ConfidenceStandard

South Sudan resilience analysis

South Sudan ranks #167 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 28.4 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 25.3, with structural readiness next at 45.2. Live shock exposure is strongest at 60, while Recovery capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 25.3. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.7 points. Dimension coverage is 72%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity0100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance12100%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water1490%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity18100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity19100%Stale
Core infrastructureInfrastructure25100%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity2985%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance2992%Stale
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure50100%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity5520%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity6065%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity6380%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance64100%Stale
Information environmentSocial and governance6455%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity70100%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security7390%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water9182%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable
Education capacitySocial and governance—30%Unmonitored

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Yemen (#166, 31.2), Somalia (#168, 21), Mali (#165, 31.5), Sudan (#169, 19.8). Comparisons in sub-Saharan Africa: Mali (#165, 31.5), Niger (#164, 32.9), Chad (#161, 34.6), Somalia (#168, 21), Ethiopia (#160, 36.3). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

The crisis registry links South Sudan to Horn of Africa. Tracker scopes are fixed and do not cover every crisis.

Reading limits

Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 73. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about South Sudan

What is South Sudan's resilience score?

South Sudan scores 28.4 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #167 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for South Sudan?

Recovery capacity is lowest at 25.3, followed by Structural readiness at 45.2. Their evidence coverage is 49% and 73%.

Is South Sudan's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.7 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related country profiles

Linked to South Sudan by a shared crisis tracker, a monitored tension pair, proximity or region.

Need South Sudan signals in your own workflow? Compare SUZU Monitor Pro and API plans for South Sudan risk data. Pro adds alert rules and AI digests; API plans serve country resilience and instability data over REST.

Live data

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the November 1, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect South Sudan are in the corrections log.

This 2026-11-01 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where SUZU Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: SUZU Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, November 1, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How SUZU Monitor compares: Best geopolitical risk intelligence platforms · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.