Sweden resilience analysis
Sweden ranks #8 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 67.6 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 69.3, with structural readiness next at 80.6. Live shock exposure is strongest at 86.4, while Recovery capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 69.3. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.4 points. Dimension coverage is 78%, and the page labels confidence as standard.
Pillar profile
- Recovery capacity: 69.3; coverage 54%; domains Recovery capacity.
- Structural readiness: 80.6; coverage 90%; domains Economic capacity, Social and governance.
- Live shock exposure: 86.4; coverage 88%; domains Infrastructure, Energy security, Health, food and water.
Six-domain profile
- Recovery capacity: 69.3; weight 25%; low Liquid-reserve adequacy 11; high Import concentration 87.
- Infrastructure: 70.4; weight 15%; low Logistics and supply chains 27; high Cyber and digital capacity 86.
- Social and governance: 80.4; weight 19%; low Social cohesion 73; high Education capacity 92.
- Economic capacity: 80.8; weight 17%; low Currency and external balance 64; high Trade policy resilience 97.
- Health, food and water: 91.5; weight 13%; low Food and water security 91; high Health and public services 92.
- Energy security: 97; weight 11%; Energy system resilience 97.
Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first
| Dimension | Domain | Score | Coverage | Evidence state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liquid-reserve adequacy | Recovery capacity | 11 | 100% | Fresh |
| Logistics and supply chains | Infrastructure | 27 | 50% | Fresh |
| Currency and external balance | Economic capacity | 64 | 85% | Fresh |
| Fiscal space | Recovery capacity | 69 | 100% | Fresh |
| Social cohesion | Social and governance | 73 | 92% | Stale |
| Border security | Social and governance | 74 | 100% | Stale |
| Core infrastructure | Infrastructure | 79 | 70% | Fresh |
| Governance and institutions | Social and governance | 82 | 100% | Fresh |
| Financial-system exposure | Economic capacity | 83 | 76% | Fresh |
| State continuity | Recovery capacity | 84 | 100% | Stale |
| Cyber and digital capacity | Infrastructure | 86 | 100% | Fresh |
| Macro-fiscal position | Economic capacity | 86 | 100% | Fresh |
| Import concentration | Recovery capacity | 87 | 100% | Fresh |
| Food and water security | Health, food and water | 91 | 82% | Fresh |
| Information environment | Social and governance | 91 | 55% | Fresh |
| Education capacity | Social and governance | 92 | 100% | Fresh |
| Health and public services | Health, food and water | 92 | 100% | Fresh |
| Energy system resilience | Energy security | 97 | 100% | Fresh |
| Trade policy resilience | Economic capacity | 97 | 100% | Fresh |
| External-debt coverage | Recovery capacity | — | 30% | Unmonitored |
| Fuel-stock buffer | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Unavailable |
| Reserve adequacy | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Unavailable |
| Sovereign fiscal buffer | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Not applicable |
Comparison set
Nearest ranked peers: Czechia (#7, 68), Finland (#9, 67.5), New Zealand (#6, 68.7), Luxembourg (#10, 66.9). Comparisons in Europe: Finland (#9, 67.5), Andorra, Czechia (#7, 68), Luxembourg (#10, 66.9), Monaco. Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.
Tracked crisis context
Sweden has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 18 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.
Reading limits
Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 97. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.
Questions about Sweden
What is Sweden's resilience score?
Sweden scores 67.6 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #8 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.
Which resilience pillars are weakest for Sweden?
Recovery capacity is lowest at 69.3, followed by Structural readiness at 80.6. Their evidence coverage is 54% and 90%.
Is Sweden's resilience score rising or falling?
The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.4 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.