Latvia resilience analysis
Latvia ranks #26 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 62.7 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 65.5, with structural readiness next at 76.2. Live shock exposure is strongest at 82.7, while Recovery capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 65.5. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.1 points. Dimension coverage is 78%, and the page labels confidence as standard.
Pillar profile
- Recovery capacity: 65.5; coverage 54%; domains Recovery capacity.
- Structural readiness: 76.2; coverage 89%; domains Economic capacity, Social and governance.
- Live shock exposure: 82.7; coverage 88%; domains Infrastructure, Energy security, Health, food and water.
Six-domain profile
- Recovery capacity: 65.5; weight 25%; low Liquid-reserve adequacy 9; high Import concentration 82.
- Infrastructure: 74.9; weight 15%; low Logistics and supply chains 27; high Cyber and digital capacity 96.
- Economic capacity: 75.3; weight 17%; low Currency and external balance 63; high Trade policy resilience 97.
- Social and governance: 77; weight 19%; low Governance and institutions 69; high Education capacity 95.
- Health, food and water: 84.9; weight 13%; low Health and public services 79; high Food and water security 92.
- Energy security: 88; weight 11%; Energy system resilience 88.
Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first
| Dimension | Domain | Score | Coverage | Evidence state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liquid-reserve adequacy | Recovery capacity | 9 | 100% | Fresh |
| Logistics and supply chains | Infrastructure | 27 | 50% | Fresh |
| Currency and external balance | Economic capacity | 63 | 85% | Fresh |
| Fiscal space | Recovery capacity | 68 | 100% | Fresh |
| Governance and institutions | Social and governance | 69 | 100% | Fresh |
| Financial-system exposure | Economic capacity | 70 | 76% | Fresh |
| Social cohesion | Social and governance | 76 | 92% | Stale |
| Border security | Social and governance | 77 | 100% | Stale |
| Information environment | Social and governance | 77 | 55% | Fresh |
| Macro-fiscal position | Economic capacity | 77 | 95% | Fresh |
| State continuity | Recovery capacity | 77 | 100% | Stale |
| Health and public services | Health, food and water | 79 | 100% | Fresh |
| Core infrastructure | Infrastructure | 79 | 70% | Fresh |
| Import concentration | Recovery capacity | 82 | 100% | Fresh |
| Energy system resilience | Energy security | 88 | 100% | Fresh |
| Food and water security | Health, food and water | 92 | 82% | Fresh |
| Education capacity | Social and governance | 95 | 100% | Fresh |
| Cyber and digital capacity | Infrastructure | 96 | 100% | Fresh |
| Trade policy resilience | Economic capacity | 97 | 100% | Fresh |
| External-debt coverage | Recovery capacity | — | 30% | Unmonitored |
| Fuel-stock buffer | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Unavailable |
| Reserve adequacy | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Unavailable |
| Sovereign fiscal buffer | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Not applicable |
Comparison set
Nearest ranked peers: Kuwait (#25, 62.8), Cyprus (#27, 62.7), Ireland (#24, 63.5), France (#28, 62.5). Comparisons in Europe: Cyprus (#27, 62.7), France (#28, 62.5), Montenegro (#29, 62.2), Ireland (#24, 63.5), Serbia (#31, 61.8). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.
Tracked crisis context
Latvia has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 18 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.
Reading limits
Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 88. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.
Questions about Latvia
What is Latvia's resilience score?
Latvia scores 62.7 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #26 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.
Which resilience pillars are weakest for Latvia?
Recovery capacity is lowest at 65.5, followed by Structural readiness at 76.2. Their evidence coverage is 54% and 89%.
Is Latvia's resilience score rising or falling?
The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.1 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.