Finland resilience analysis
Finland ranks #9 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 67.5 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 68.6, with structural readiness next at 81. Live shock exposure is strongest at 87.3, while Recovery capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 68.6. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at +0.5 points. Dimension coverage is 78%, and the page labels confidence as standard.
Pillar profile
- Recovery capacity: 68.6; coverage 54%; domains Recovery capacity.
- Structural readiness: 81; coverage 91%; domains Economic capacity, Social and governance.
- Live shock exposure: 87.3; coverage 85%; domains Infrastructure, Energy security, Health, food and water.
Six-domain profile
- Recovery capacity: 68.6; weight 25%; low Liquid-reserve adequacy 6; high State continuity 89.
- Infrastructure: 74.5; weight 15%; low Logistics and supply chains 27; high Cyber and digital capacity 95.
- Economic capacity: 78.5; weight 17%; low Currency and external balance 62; high Trade policy resilience 97.
- Social and governance: 83.1; weight 19%; low Border security 75; high Education capacity 90.
- Health, food and water: 89.5; weight 13%; low Health and public services 89; high Food and water security 90.
- Energy security: 99; weight 11%; Energy system resilience 99.
Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first
| Dimension | Domain | Score | Coverage | Evidence state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liquid-reserve adequacy | Recovery capacity | 6 | 100% | Fresh |
| Logistics and supply chains | Infrastructure | 27 | 50% | Fresh |
| Currency and external balance | Economic capacity | 62 | 85% | Fresh |
| Fiscal space | Recovery capacity | 63 | 100% | Fresh |
| Border security | Social and governance | 75 | 100% | Stale |
| Core infrastructure | Infrastructure | 79 | 70% | Fresh |
| Financial-system exposure | Economic capacity | 82 | 76% | Fresh |
| Macro-fiscal position | Economic capacity | 82 | 100% | Fresh |
| Social cohesion | Social and governance | 82 | 92% | Stale |
| Governance and institutions | Social and governance | 86 | 100% | Fresh |
| Information environment | Social and governance | 87 | 70% | Fresh |
| Import concentration | Recovery capacity | 88 | 100% | Fresh |
| Health and public services | Health, food and water | 89 | 100% | Fresh |
| State continuity | Recovery capacity | 89 | 100% | Stale |
| Education capacity | Social and governance | 90 | 100% | Fresh |
| Food and water security | Health, food and water | 90 | 82% | Fresh |
| Cyber and digital capacity | Infrastructure | 95 | 100% | Fresh |
| Trade policy resilience | Economic capacity | 97 | 100% | Fresh |
| Energy system resilience | Energy security | 99 | 90% | Fresh |
| External-debt coverage | Recovery capacity | — | 30% | Unmonitored |
| Fuel-stock buffer | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Unavailable |
| Reserve adequacy | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Unavailable |
| Sovereign fiscal buffer | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Not applicable |
Comparison set
Nearest ranked peers: Sweden (#8, 67.6), Luxembourg (#10, 66.9), Czechia (#7, 68), Samoa (#11, 66.8). Comparisons in Europe: Sweden (#8, 67.6), Andorra, Czechia (#7, 68), Luxembourg (#10, 66.9), Monaco. Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.
Tracked crisis context
Finland has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 18 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.
Reading limits
Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 99. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.
Questions about Finland
What is Finland's resilience score?
Finland scores 67.5 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #9 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.
Which resilience pillars are weakest for Finland?
Recovery capacity is lowest at 68.6, followed by Structural readiness at 81. Their evidence coverage is 54% and 91%.
Is Finland's resilience score rising or falling?
The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of +0.5 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.