SUZU Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · MZ

Mozambique country risk and resilience

Mozambique country risk and resilience: ranked #152 of 169 in SUZU Monitor's index, with current instability, travel advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Mozambique instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Increased Caution
OFAC designations in feed8 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Mozambique on the live map →

Recent developments in Mozambique

  1. GDELT 190 — in Mozambique — source: www.riotimesonline.com conflict source
  2. GDELT 190 — in Mozambique — source: www.riotimesonline.com conflict source
  3. GDELT 192 — in Mozambique — source: www.citizen.co.za conflict source
  4. GDELT 190 — in Mozambique — source: saharareporters.com conflict source
  5. GDELT 190 — in Mozambique — source: saharareporters.com conflict source
  6. GDELT 190 — in Mozambique — source: saharareporters.com conflict source
  7. GDELT 190 — in Mozambique — source: saharareporters.com conflict source
  8. GDELT 190 — in Mozambique — source: saharareporters.com conflict source
  9. GDELT 190 — in Mozambique — source: saharareporters.com conflict source
  10. GDELT 190 — in Mozambique — source: saharareporters.com conflict source

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#152
Overall score39.8
Dimension coverage86%
ConfidenceStandard

Mozambique resilience analysis

Mozambique ranks #152 of 169 countries with an overall resilience score of 39.8 out of 100. Structural readiness is the weakest pillar at 50.5, with live shock exposure next at 53.8. Recovery capacity is strongest at 55.3, while Health, food and water is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 37. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at +0.6 points. Dimension coverage is 86%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Education capacitySocial and governance10100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure14100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity18100%Stale
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity22100%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water25100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure25100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance29100%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity4180%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance4892%Stale
Food and water securityHealth, food and water49100%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity5685%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity57100%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity66100%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance69100%Stale
Import concentrationRecovery capacity70100%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity70100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance7255%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity84100%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security8790%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Guinea (#151, 40.1), Guinea-Bissau (#153, 39.6), Burundi (#150, 40.4), Zimbabwe (#154, 39.4). Comparisons in sub-Saharan Africa: Guinea-Bissau (#153, 39.6), Guinea (#151, 40.1), Zimbabwe (#154, 39.4), Burundi (#150, 40.4), Nigeria (#148, 40.5). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Mozambique has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 18 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the November 1, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 87. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Mozambique

What is Mozambique's resilience score?

Mozambique scores 39.8 out of 100 in the November 1, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #152 of 169 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Mozambique?

Structural readiness is lowest at 50.5, followed by Live shock exposure at 53.8. Their evidence coverage is 90% and 97%.

Is Mozambique's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of +0.6 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related country profiles

Linked to Mozambique by a shared crisis tracker, a monitored tension pair, proximity or region.

Need Mozambique signals in your own workflow? Compare SUZU Monitor Pro and API plans for Mozambique risk data. Pro adds alert rules and AI digests; API plans serve country resilience and instability data over REST.

Live data

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the November 1, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Mozambique are in the corrections log.

This 2026-11-01 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where SUZU Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: SUZU Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, November 1, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How SUZU Monitor compares: Best geopolitical risk intelligence platforms · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.